Showing posts with label Gibbs Free Energy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gibbs Free Energy. Show all posts

Thursday, January 15, 2015

Special Newsletter Gibbs Free Energy and Transition State Energy (Reposting)

Special Newsletter
Gibbs Free Energy and Transition State Energy


This goal of this newsletter is to help students navigate the complexity of Gibbs Free Energy (ΔG) and help avoid confusion about Gibbs Free Energy and Transition State Energy (Energy of Activation).

Gibbs Free Energy (ΔG) is a thermodynamics concept, and describes the thermodynamic potential of a system.  It measures the "work" that can be obtained from a system, for us a chemical reaction, if that system is held at constant temperature and pressure.  The goal is to determine whether a given reaction is spontaneous in the direction written, i.e., whether the reaction will proceed in the given direction without the input of energy.

Mathematically, Gibbs Free Energy is described as:
ΔG=ΔHTΔS

Where:
  • ΔG  The change in Free Energy
  • ΔH  The change in Enthalpy
  • ΔS   The change in Entropy
In biochemistry, the change in Enthalpy (ΔH) is the same as the change in internal energy.  Remember that ΔG is calculated based on a set of given conditions:  we are at constant temperature and pressure, and all variables have been taken into account (such as the solvent of the system).  If you change anything, you change the system, and thus the ΔG.

Gibbs free energy is a measure ONLY of the difference in free energy of the products and reactants, and does not tell us about the rate of the reaction.  It only tells us whether the reaction is Exergonic or Endergonic.
  • ΔG < 0   Exergonic:  The reaction is considered spontaneous in the direction written.
  • ΔG = 0   The system is in equilibrium
  • ΔG >0    Endergonic:  To carry out this reaction as written, there needs to be an addition of free energy (NOTE: this means that the reverse reaction is spontaneous).

Transition State Energy is not Gibbs Free Energy.
Gibbs Free Energy does not describe the path of transformation or the mechanism of transformation.  It does not describe the rate of transformation.  It only describes whether the reaction is spontaneous, non-spontaneous or at equilibrium.

The breakdown of the dissacharide sucrose to glucose and fructose has a ΔG of -5.5 kcal/mol.  This is a spontaneous (Exergonic) reaction in terms of ΔG.  Yet you can store sucrose in your kitchen and it remains sucrose.  There is no spontaneous degradation into monosaccharides.  Why?

Sucrose is a stable molecule.  In order to force the breakdown (catabolism) of sucrose, we need to destabilize the molecule.  This destabilization is the transition state of the reaction, and in a closed system, requires the input of energy.  This is termed the Activation Energy of the reaction (you will also hear this described as the Transition State Energy).  If we were to look at our breakdown of sucrose, we would see the following:
Sucrose   ⇄    Transition State   →   Glucose + Fructose

The energy of the transition state is noted as either Ea or ΔG.  These two expression are from different formula for calculating activation energy. ΔG is used in a formula that relates activation energy to Gibbs Free Energy (the Eyring equation).  In either case, the expression describe transition state energy (aka, activation energy).

In biochemistry, enzymes are used to reduce the activation energy (just like catalysts are used in chemistry).  Catalysts and Enzymes reduce the activation energy ΔG; they do not alter Gibbs Free Energy (ΔG).  This is a critical concept!

Transition state deals with the rate of the reaction.  By lowering the activation energy (transition state energy), you increase the rate of the reaction.  In essence, you are making the reaction more likely to happen.  But the enzyme does not change Gibbs Free Energy.
Original Image from ChemWiki,
http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/@api/deki/files/10017/fREE_eNERgY_cHART.jpg?size=bestfit&width=471&height=294&revision=1

Take home message:

Gibbs Free Energy (ΔG) describes whether a reaction is exergonic or endergonic.  It does not describe rate, and neither enzymes or catalysts will alter ΔG.

Activation Energy (ΔG) does not alter ΔG; it does not determine whether a reaction is spontaneous or non-spontaneous. Activation energy does help determine the rate of the reaction.

Friday, September 19, 2014

Special Newsletter: Gibbs Free Energy and Transition State Energy

Special Newsletter
Gibbs Free Energy and Transition State Energy


This goal of this newsletter is to help students navigate the complexity of Gibbs Free Energy (ΔG) and help avoid confusion about Gibbs Free Energy and Transition State Energy (Energy of Activation).

Gibbs Free Energy (ΔG) is a thermodynamics concept, and describes the thermodynamic potential of a system.  It measures the "work" that can be obtained from a system, for us a chemical reaction, if that system is held at constant temperature and pressure.  The goal is to determine whether a given reaction is spontaneous in the direction written, i.e., whether the reaction will proceed in the given direction without the input of energy.

Mathematically, Gibbs Free Energy is described as:
ΔG=ΔHTΔS

Where:
  • ΔG  The change in Free Energy
  • ΔH  The change in Enthalpy
  • ΔS   The change in Entropy
In biochemistry, the change in Enthalpy (ΔH) is the same as the change in internal energy.  Remember that ΔG is calculated based on a set of given conditions:  we are at constant temperature and pressure, and all variables have been taken into account (such as the solvent of the system).  If you change anything, you change the system, and thus the ΔG.

Gibbs free energy is a measure ONLY of the difference in free energy of the products and reactants, and does not tell us about the rate of the reaction.  It only tells us whether the reaction is Exergonic or Endergonic.
  • ΔG < 0   Exergonic:  The reaction is considered spontaneous in the direction written.
  • ΔG = 0   The system is in equilibrium
  • ΔG >0    Endergonic:  To carry out this reaction as written, there needs to be an addition of free energy (NOTE: this means that the reverse reaction is spontaneous).

Transition State Energy is not Gibbs Free Energy.
Gibbs Free Energy does not describe the path of transformation or the mechanism of transformation.  It does not describe the rate of transformation.  It only describes whether the reaction is spontaneous, non-spontaneous or at equilibrium.

The breakdown of the dissacharide sucrose to glucose and fructose has a ΔG of -5.5 kcal/mol.  This is a spontaneous (Exergonic) reaction in terms of ΔG.  Yet you can store sucrose in your kitchen and it remains sucrose.  There is no spontaneous degradation into monosaccharides.  Why?

Sucrose is a stable molecule.  In order to force the breakdown (catabolism) of sucrose, we need to destabilize the molecule.  This destabilization is the transition state of the reaction, and in a closed system, requires the input of energy.  This is termed the Activation Energy of the reaction (you will also hear this described as the Transition State Energy).  If we were to look at our breakdown of sucrose, we would see the following:

Sucrose   ⇄    Transition State   →   Glucose + Fructose

The energy of the transition state is noted as either Ea or ΔG.  These two expression are from different formula for calculating activation energy. ΔG is used in a formula that relates activation energy to Gibbs Free Energy (the Eyring equation).  In either case, the expression describe transition state energy (aka, activation energy).

In biochemistry, enzymes are used to reduce the activation energy (just like catalysts are used in chemistry).  Catalysts and Enzymes reduce the activation energy ΔG; they do not alter Gibbs Free Energy (ΔG).  This is a critical concept!

Transition state deals with the rate of the reaction.  By lowering the activation energy (transition state energy), you increase the rate of the reaction.  In essence, you are making the reaction more likely to happen.  But the enzyme does not change Gibbs Free Energy.
Original Image from ChemWiki,
http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/@api/deki/files/10017/fREE_eNERgY_cHART.jpg?size=bestfit&width=471&height=294&revision=1

Take home message:

Gibbs Free Energy (ΔG) describes whether a reaction is exergonic or endergonic.  It does not describe rate, and neither enzymes or catalysts will alter ΔG.

Activation Energy (ΔG) does not alter ΔG; it does not determine whether a reaction is spontaneous or non-spontaneous. Activation energy does help determine the rate of the reaction.

Tuesday, September 25, 2012

Daily Newsletter: September 25, 2012 - Adenosine Triphosphate

Site logoDaily Newsletter

September 25, 2012 Adenosine Triphosphate


Administrative Note

Remember that Milestone Exam 1 ends tonight at 6pm. Make sure you have completed the exam by 6pm.

You have most likely heard ATP referred to as the "energy currency" of the cell. In fact, your textbook uses this analogy: "Just as it is more effective, efficient, and convenient for you to trade money for a lunch than to trade your actual labor, it is useful for cells to have a single currency for transferring energy between different reactions and cell processes."
This is a lovely fiction that does not serve molecular biologists. It is a convenient expression, but it conveys a very serious misconception.

Nucleotide triphosphates (ATP, GTP, CTP, TTP and UTP) have their foundation in the nucleotide structure, with the addition of extra phosphate groups. Adenosine Triphosphate is the most prevalent nucleotide triphosphate, and is found as a cofactor in a number of enzymatic reactions. The picture below show the general structure of ATP.

NOTE: the nucleotide triphosphates use RIBOSE as the sugar. If the nucleotide triphosphate utilized deoxyribose, we add the letter "d" in front of the abbreviation; so dATP represents a deoxyribo-nuclotide. The only time the cell ultilizes dATP, dGTP, dCTP and dTTP is during the process of replication (DNA synthesis).

You have three phosphate groups, each with a negative charge, covalently bonded to each other. The phosphate groups naturally want to repel each other, but they are held together by one of the strongest bond types (covalent bonds). What does this mean? Molecular tension! But it must be noted that ATP is chemically stable. It does not spontaneously loose phosphates (if it did, you would also release heat). It takes enzymatic action to remove the phosphate. When a phosphate is removed from ATP, it is generally attached to another molecular structure (enzymes, sugars, etc...). The exception to this will be in building nucleic acids.

Chemist vs. Biologist

In yesterday's newsletter, a distinction was made between the perspective of chemists and biologists. If you look in most books that deal with biology, you will find the following euqation for ATP:
ATP + H2O → ADP + Pi ΔG˚ = −30.5 kJ/mol (−7.3 kcal/mol)
This is a look at ATP hydrolysis in isolation. Do you remember how ΔG is calculated? Look at the units. kJ (kilo-Joules) or kcal (kilocalories). We are basing this on an isolated reaction and measuring heat. When you look at the ΔG when there are metal ions present, you get a different number. You should also be familiar with ΔG, or Gibbs Free Energy, which is a measure of the amount of work that can be acheived by the energy release. A ΔG˚ = −30.5 kJ/mol is big, and implies that there is a great deal of energy released (the molecule can perform work).

Biologists though recognize that ATP is not in isolation. The intracellular fluid compartment (cytosol) contains ions, and more importantly metal ions, especially Mg2+ (causes major changes in hydrolysis ΔG). Inside of cells, the ΔG˚ of ATP hydrolysis is higher, approximately -50 kJ/mol (-12 kcal/mol). If we released this much energy every time ATP was hydrolyzed, the cell would boil! But, we use this energy for something else: binding the phosphate to another substrate (phosphorylation). When we phosphorylate a compound, we are building a covalent bond between the phosphate and the compound. This requires energy.1 About half the free energy is going to be used to make this covalent bond between the phosphate and the substrate. What happens with the rest? The second law of thermodynamics tells us that some of it is lost (this is an energy transfer after all...we broke one bond to build another), but the bond it self is hold some as well. Remember, chemical bonds are Potential Energy. When phosphate is removed, there will be another change in free energy (every reaction has a ΔG).

So what is the misconception with "energy currency"?
To answer this, we need to ask two other questions: why do we think of ATP as having High Energy Bonds and what is enery to a cell?

Why do we think of ATP in terms of High Energy Bonds? The answer is in the discussion above. The phosphoanhydride bonds (covalent bonds between the phosphate groups) have a high ΔG when they are hydrolyzed. This is why they have been called "high energy bonds". But in biology, the energy is used to immediately allow the phosphate group to bind to a new substrate (Phosphorylation). Put another way, the work that is done is in forming the covalent bond between the phosphate and the new substrate! The ATP is NOT a battery that energizes a curcuit.

What is energy to a cell? Ask yourself, in building bonds in chemistry, what is the energy? If you want to change the energy state in a molecule, what do you do? Isn't it all about the electrons. Ultimately, the energy cells really use will be found with electrons, specifically through redox reactions. We will see that reducing potential is the energy the cells are harvesting and storing. This will be our discussion tomorrow.

Now we come to the big question: What does ATP do?
The concept of ATP as an "energy currency" comes from ATP turning on enzymes or assisting an enzyme during a "power steps" in a metabolic pathways. But ATP does not add energy; it just rearranges charge distribution around a molecule (electrochemistry). Remember, the phosphate group is negatively charged (-2).
When you add a phosphate group to a protein, you change the electrical signature around that portion of the protein (same will be true of other molecules as well). This includes the ability to form new hydrogen bonds, which can alter both secondary and tertiary structures. What will happen to the protein? It will change shape (conformational change). The work that ATP enables (and again this relates back to the free energy) is it's ability to cause conformational changes and induce molecular tension (instabilities).

Protein Phsophorylation
Above  is a general diagrapm showing a phosphorulation event. Notice how the phosphate group has interacted through van der Waals forces to change the tertiary structure of the protein.

The image below is a variant example of how ATP interacts with proteins. In this case, we see the the interaction of Myosin and Actin during muscle contraction. Focus your attention on the myosin molecule in blue. Notice that the "head" of the myosin changes conformation (shape) as ATP binds and is hydrolyzed. This is an important concept. When ATP binds, and hydrolysis occurs, a conformation change occurs. When ADP and Pi leave, the molecule resumes its "resting" conformation. In this case, it is the binding of the entire ATP molecule (with multiple negative charges) and subsequent hydrolysis which causes the conformational change. It still comes down to changing the electrical profile of the molecule (NOTE: there are more conformational changes occuring than are seen in this).  Myosin Cross Bridge (Moving Myosin Heads Bind to Actin)
.

As we will see in upcoming weeks, this change of shape is critical to enzyme function. You have already encountered this once before, with the Sodium/Potassium ATPase.

Daily Challenge

Today, I want you to discuss the function of ATP. Do not describe it as an energy currency, instead describe how the addition of phosphates cause a change in the electrochemistry of a protein, and how that affects the conformation of the protein. Use Myosin in muscle cells as your example. We have not covered Myosin, but it is a very easy model for how ATP acts.
Link to Forum

Reference

1. Berg JM, Tymoczko JL, Stryer L. (2002). Biochemistry. W H Freeman, New York. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK22399/, accessed on September 25, 2012